Comments on: Street Art vs. Graffiti http://www.marcmoss.net/2008/08/04/street-art-vs-graffiti/ Marc Moss is a local artist in Missoula Montana. Sat, 13 Mar 2010 23:14:54 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Marc Moss http://www.marcmoss.net/2008/08/04/street-art-vs-graffiti/comment-page-1/#comment-5212 Marc Moss Thu, 22 Jan 2009 04:07:46 +0000 http://www.marcmoss.net/2008/08/04/street-art-vs-graffiti/#comment-5212 Thanks, jzzy. Good stuff Thanks, jzzy. Good stuff

]]> By: jzzy http://www.marcmoss.net/2008/08/04/street-art-vs-graffiti/comment-page-1/#comment-5189 jzzy Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:39:19 +0000 http://www.marcmoss.net/2008/08/04/street-art-vs-graffiti/#comment-5189 Sweet blog by the way! Sweet blog by the way!

]]> By: jzzy http://www.marcmoss.net/2008/08/04/street-art-vs-graffiti/comment-page-1/#comment-5188 jzzy Mon, 22 Dec 2008 01:38:59 +0000 http://www.marcmoss.net/2008/08/04/street-art-vs-graffiti/#comment-5188 Outstanding blog entry - great flickz. if you are looking for more info on graffiti and street art and stencil tips tricks techniques (and secrets) check out the following: <a href="http://tr.im/1w0g" rel="nofollow">http://tr.im/1w0g</a> Outstanding blog entry – great flickz. if you are looking for more info on graffiti and street art and stencil tips tricks techniques (and secrets) check out the following: http://tr.im/1w0g

]]> By: This is Not the Street Art You Are Looking For | Marc Makes Art http://www.marcmoss.net/2008/08/04/street-art-vs-graffiti/comment-page-1/#comment-5114 This is Not the Street Art You Are Looking For | Marc Makes Art Tue, 26 Aug 2008 05:58:12 +0000 http://www.marcmoss.net/2008/08/04/street-art-vs-graffiti/#comment-5114 [...] had nothing to paint over? Not that there wouldn’t be graffiti, but that it was done without paint? Missoula being the environmentally friendly “green” town that it is should have no [...] [...] had nothing to paint over? Not that there wouldn’t be graffiti, but that it was done without paint? Missoula being the environmentally friendly “green” town that it is should have no [...]

]]> By: Brian http://www.marcmoss.net/2008/08/04/street-art-vs-graffiti/comment-page-1/#comment-5107 Brian Thu, 07 Aug 2008 05:16:44 +0000 http://www.marcmoss.net/2008/08/04/street-art-vs-graffiti/#comment-5107 Well graffiti is really whatever you want it to be or define .It can be political or make you think.But any of that brand wouldn't exist today had the artists not seen something else layed down elsewhwere.If you notice, most the political related stuff is really some of the worst looking shit on the street.Usually a generic lettered attempt at creating attention.Unless it actually contains something really witty it wouldnt really get a second look by non graff writers.Something vibrant, colorful and cryptically styled on the other hand seems to generate more discussion and observation by the general public.Ive seen first hand in Missoula what a moniker can establish as far as attention when its creative and done in repitition.You overhear people in a public atmosphere talking,the media writes about it.A writer seems to get more attention when he repeatedly destroys city and public property over and over. As far as the question of whether or not its art goes,I think its art as long as the attempt at art is there.Some writers have no artistic talent but have the balls to hit up multiple locations over and over.Alot of talented artists are still considered toys because they want to be a graff artist but dont have the balls to put the true work in. Stencilism isnt really my gig but it gets my attention and respect all day due to the fact that even though that stencil cutout wasnt created at the scene of the crime,it took seriouse stones to pack that thing to a public location with a can of spray and make the obvious gesture of vandalism.And some of those cutouts cant be to easy to conceal. Sorry,its late and have to work in the morning,I hit this spot back up this weekennd probably.Peace Marc! Well graffiti is really whatever you want it to be or define .It can be political or make you think.But any of that brand wouldn’t exist today had the artists not seen something else layed down elsewhwere.If you notice, most the political related stuff is really some of the worst looking shit on the street.Usually a generic lettered attempt at creating attention.Unless it actually contains something really witty it wouldnt really get a second look by non graff writers.Something vibrant, colorful and cryptically styled on the other hand seems to generate more discussion and observation by the general public.Ive seen first hand in Missoula what a moniker can establish as far as attention when its creative and done in repitition.You overhear people in a public atmosphere talking,the media writes about it.A writer seems to get more attention when he repeatedly destroys city and public property over and over.

As far as the question of whether or not its art goes,I think its art as long as the attempt at art is there.Some writers have no artistic talent but have the balls to hit up multiple locations over and over.Alot of talented artists are still considered toys because they want to be a graff artist but dont have the balls to put the true work in.

Stencilism isnt really my gig but it gets my attention and respect all day due to the fact that even though that stencil cutout wasnt created at the scene of the crime,it took seriouse stones to pack that thing to a public location with a can of spray and make the obvious gesture of vandalism.And some of those cutouts cant be to easy to conceal.

Sorry,its late and have to work in the morning,I hit this spot back up this weekennd probably.Peace Marc!

]]>